Mikhail Karpenko committed changes to the Elphel git project :
Remove dev_dbg from IRQ and save state to buffer, read buffer from sysfs

Mikhail Karpenko committed changes to the Elphel git project :
Remove dev_dbg from IRQ and save state to buffer, read buffer from sysfs

AndreyFilippov committed changes to the Elphel git project :
more experimenting

AndreyFilippov committed changes to the Elphel git project :
more experimenting

AndreyFilippov committed changes to the Elphel git project :
got stable convergence of LMA when doing kernel factorization

AndreyFilippov committed changes to the Elphel git project :
got stable convergence of LMA when doing kernel factorization

AndreyFilippov committed changes to the Elphel git project :
more trying

AndreyFilippov committed changes to the Elphel git project :
more trying

Oleg Dzhimiev committed changes to the Elphel git project :
index page

Oleg Dzhimiev committed changes to the Elphel git project :
index page

Sometimes we need to test disks connected to camera and we developed a small test program for this purpose. This program basically resembles camogm (in-camera recording program) in its operation and allows us to write repeating blocks of data containing counter value and then check the consistency of the data written. This program works directly with disk driver and collects some statistics during its operation. Disk driver, among other things, measures the time between two events: when write command is issued and when command completion interrupt from controller is received. This time can be used to measure disk write speed as the amount of data sent to disk with each command is also known. In general, this time slightly floats around its average value given that the amount of data written with each command is almost the same. But long run tests have shown that sometimes the interrupt return time after write command can be much longer then the average time.

We decided to investigate this situation in a little bit more details and tested two SSDs with our test program. The disks used for tests were SanDisk SD8SMAT128G1122 and Crucial CT250MX200SSD6, both were connected to eSATA camera port over M.2 SSD adapter. We used these disks before and they demonstrated different performance during recording. We ran camogm_test to write 3 MB blocks of data in cyclic mode. The program collected delayed interrupt times reported by driver as well as the amount of data written since the last delay event. The processed results of the test are in the following table:

Disk Average IRQ reception time, ms Standard deviation, ms Average IRQ delay time, ms Standard deviation, ms Data recorded since last IRQ delay, GB Standard deviation, GB CT250MX200SSD6 (250 GB) 11.9 1.1 804 12.7 499.7 111.7 SD8SMAT128G1122 (128 GB) 19.3 4.8 113 6.5 231.5 11.5

The delayed interrupt times of these disks are considerably different although the difference in average interrupt times which reflect disk write speeds is not that big. It is interesting to notice that the amount of data written to disk between two consecutive interrupt delays is almost twice the total disk size. smartctl reported the increase of Runtime_Bad_Block attribute for CT250MX200SSD6 after each delay but the delays occurred each time on different LBAs. Unfortunately, SD8SMAT128G1122 does not have such parameter in its smartctl attributes and it is difficult to compare the two disks by this parameter.

Oleg Dzhimiev committed changes to the Elphel git project :
10389 board not present case

Oleg Dzhimiev committed changes to the Elphel git project :
10389 board not present case

Oleg Dzhimiev committed changes to the Elphel git project :
status file if 10389 is present

Oleg Dzhimiev committed changes to the Elphel git project :
status file if 10389 is present

Improvements over the earlier generation Eyesis4Pi:

← Older revision Revision as of 23:31, 22 December 2016 (2 intermediate revisions not shown)Line 20: Line 20: ^* ''Car and backpack mounts are not included.'' ^* ''Car and backpack mounts are not included.'' -====Improvements over older generation [[Eyesis4Pi]]====+====Improvements over the earlier generation [[Eyesis4Pi]]==== * new [[10393]] system boards * new [[10393]] system boards -** faster recording+** compressor bandwidth: 1 GPix/s vs. 85 MPix/s -** more powerful+** only 3 system boards needed to support all 26 sensors vs. 9 -* more compact - the pole is 2 times shorter+** contemporary OpenEmbedded Linux OS -* lighter+** full 5 FPS at high quality vs. 2 FPS  +** faster recording speed: 220 MB/s x 3 vs. 16 MB/s x 9  +** Gigabit Ethernet vs. 100 MB  +* more compact    +* more lightweight |} |} Olga

Status:

← Older revision Revision as of 21:45, 22 December 2016 Line 5: Line 5: <font style="font-size:1em;color:black">Production</font> <font style="font-size:1em;color:black">Production</font> -The newer version <font style='font-size:1.5em;color:red'><b>EYESIS4PI-26-393</b></font> is <font style='font-size:1em;color:red'><b>coming soon</b></font>.  +The newer version <font style='font-size:1.5em;color:red'><b>EYESIS4PI-26-393</b></font> is <font style='font-size:1em;color:red'><b>available</b></font>. Jump to [[Eyesis4Pi_393|Eyesis4Pi-393 article]]. Features: Features: Oleg

Status:

← Older revision Revision as of 21:45, 22 December 2016 Line 4: Line 4: <font style="font-size:1em;color:black">Production</font> <font style="font-size:1em;color:black">Production</font> -The newer version <font style='font-size:1.5em;color:red'><b>EYESIS4PI-26-393</b></font> is <font style='font-size:1em;color:red'><b>coming soon</b></font>.  +The newer version [[Eyesis4Pi_393|<font style='font-size:1.5em;color:red'><b>EYESIS4PI-393</b></font>]] is <font style='font-size:1em;color:red'><b>available</b></font>. Jump to [[Eyesis4Pi_393|Eyesis4Pi-393 article]]. Features: Features: Oleg

← Older revision Revision as of 20:53, 22 December 2016 (3 intermediate revisions not shown)Line 1: Line 1:  +[[Image:hp_banner_eyesis.png]] ==Status== ==Status== Available Available Line 109: Line 110: ==More information== ==More information== - +* [[Mt9p006_specs| Image sensors specs]] -====Tech specs of a single image sensor====+ -{| border="1" class="wikitable"+ -|-+ -! Model+ -| [http://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions/product.do?id=MT9P006 ONSemi MT9P006]+ -|-+ -! Color Image Sensor + -| 1/2.5" bayer-pattern CMOS+ -|-+ -! Effective number of pixels + -| 2592x1936 (5,018,112 pixels)+ -|-+ -! Aspect Ratio + -| Chip 4:3, Region of interest freely adjustable in 16 pixel steps+ -|-+ -! Sensor Output + -| 12 Bit ADC+ -|-+ -! Sensor Features + -| Region of interest, on-chip binning and decimation+ -|-+ -! Dynamic Range + -| 70 db (76 db at 2x2 binning)+ -|-+ -! Electronic Shutter + -| 1 us to "very long" (~3h) in 1us steps+ -|-+ -! Shutter Type+ -| ERS+ -|-+ -! Gain + -| Analog &amp; Digital (0 db to 12 db continuous)+ -|}+ {| {| Oleg

More information:

← Older revision Revision as of 20:33, 22 December 2016 (One intermediate revision not shown)Line 109: Line 109: ==More information== ==More information== - +* [[Mt9p006_specs| Image sensors specs]] -====Tech specs of a single image sensor====+ -{| border="1" class="wikitable"+ -|-+ -! Model+ -| [http://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions/product.do?id=MT9P006 ONSemi MT9P006]+ -|-+ -! Color Image Sensor + -| 1/2.5" bayer-pattern CMOS+ -|-+ -! Effective number of pixels + -| 2592x1936 (5,018,112 pixels)+ -|-+ -! Aspect Ratio + -| Chip 4:3, Region of interest freely adjustable in 16 pixel steps+ -|-+ -! Sensor Output + -| 12 Bit ADC+ -|-+ -! Sensor Features + -| Region of interest, on-chip binning and decimation+ -|-+ -! Dynamic Range + -| 70 db (76 db at 2x2 binning)+ -|-+ -! Electronic Shutter + -| 1 us to "very long" (~3h) in 1us steps+ -|-+ -! Shutter Type+ -| ERS+ -|-+ -! Gain + -| Analog &amp; Digital (0 db to 12 db continuous)+ -|}+ {| {| Oleg